EFI tech stuff

Old forum posts ending on Oct 21 '09

Moderator: TechMOGogy

Locked
pinztrek
Barbados
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 9:27 pm
Location: Atlanta Area
Contact:

Post by pinztrek »

Erik712m wrote: First, from what I read, your controller is preset from you guy's with no adjustment needed? Jake has stated several times in post that some adjustment, would be needed by the installer do to differances in gas in are local area.
Yes, we plan to ship the controller pre-configured. I have full control over all parameters as needed, no concerns there. But our approach is focused on "no tuning required" system.

I can understand Jakes positioning as needing some tuning, but not necessarily for the gas reason he gave.

Detailed EFI discussion follows, skip if you are not into specifics!

Yes, gas differences can be in issue on high compression, high HP turbo engines. But the pinz low compression is pretty tolerant of fuel changes. I'll ask you this, do you change your carb tuning for winter to summer fuel blend differences? Most do not, as it's not that big of a change on low compression engines.

The biggest area you would ever see an issue would be in timing advance, etc. Just not as big of an issue on the pinz.

Fuel quality/mix concerns are an EFI generalism in the import tuner world that we have not seen, as we are low compression, non-turbo. Would absolutely be a factor in Jakes high compression turbo VW & Porsche worlds. But as much due to octane/mixture cooling as anything else. (Blends don't cool the chamber/valves as well)

The bigger issue is with a partial kit, to be installed by whomever, you have limited control over fuel pump, regulator, and thus pressure. That's probably the biggest single variable in an EFI system. How much fuel get's injected per N millisecond pulse. And one of the main reasons we are not offering a partial kit..... we (like an OEM) need to make sure the fuel supply side is consistent from install to install. This just means a consistent pump & filter model, same regulator set to same spec, same plumbing.

There may be need to allow for different regional fuels, but it would take something like mexican gas to make a noticable difference in the pinz, and even then the system should compensate.
Erik712m wrote: Second, he has stated several times that not all engines perform the same do to what i'm guessing wear of the engine so some adjustments will be needed by the owner. From what I read in your post, you're saying all engines are the same even if the engine is worn the Efi is going to treat it the same. The worn engine is just going to preform like a worn engine with no adjustment needed?
Erik
Again, good caution from Jake for a partial kit install. Lot's of variables. We are trying to make as many consistent as possible.

What we can't control is engine wear & muffler backpressure. (We do control air filter). Compression is probably the biggest change you would see, maybe a little reduced flow due to valve/cam issues. All of these factors would manifest as slightly reduced VE (Volumetric Efficiency). VE is essentially how much air the engine actually pumps divided by it's theoretical CFM based on displacement, rpm, and cam timing & valve size. It's typically a percentage. Really high flow engines get up in the 70+% range. The pinz get's significantly less than that! :-)

So what's the impact on the pinz? Well, it's already a fairly low VE engine, unlike highly optimized sports car engines. It operates at almost half the rpm range of most aftermarket EFI cars, etc and an even lower VE range (idle to peak)

In a MAP (Manifold absolute Pressure) or MAF based system, reduced VE shows up as reduced vacuum/higher absolute pressure (MAP) or reduced airflow (MAF), two different measures of the same thing. You would shift slightly in the tuning matrix (another thing called a map). But it largely self compensates..... reduced flow -> reduced rpm -> less airflow/higher pressure shifts you to a lower portion of the matrix. And it sends less fuel.

Notice I said largely self compensates. It's not an exact thing, but it reduces the correction required by the closed loop control. So new engine to well used but not broken, the difference is well within closed loop correction range. In the cases we run open loop we are intentionally rich, and the small difference in VE will not have much impact.

Again, this is a big issue in the import tuner high HP/turbo world. They are dealing with huge spikes in there effective VE due to boost. Much more complicated, and in most cases they are running on the ragged edge. But that's not the pinz. The pinz has a very smooth VE curve with less than half to 1/3 the VE change idle to peak than the average euro or asian aftermarket EFI vehicle sees.

We may provide access to a scaling factor that allows a few percent change in the baseline fuel calcs to compensate for engine wear, different exhaust systems, etc. So far this has not been needed.

Change a cam, change the intake, all bets are off, which is what drives most folks to need to retune. Thus our focus on box stock 2.5l and 2.7l with cam. We may add others, but these are the two with the most demand.

OEM's deal with this issue all the time. You don't have to reprogram your ECU from new to 200k miles in your normal car/truck, even with muffler/air filter changes, etc. They do add an extra step of trim with newer systems (OBD & later). The system constantly measures the error correction for each bin, and it converges over time. That's what goes away if you disconnect your battery. You start fresh and the ECU compensates just like ours does.

What we intentionally are not providing is a home brew, tune it yourself system. You should not have to, and if you want to do that, then our system is not for you. We can't support a system which has users changing parameters willy-nilly.

There are roughly 1000 individual parameters we specify in the controller. (Plus many we are not leveraging, as they are not needed) Net-net: lot's to break if you provide full access to the variables. One small change impacts dozens of others, outside of a few areas like warmup, etc.

Think you have a problem? We'll have you record a datalog which we will look at. If there is an issue, we'll send an updated file or cpu one.

What about altitude? System is constantly measuring barometric pressure and compensates automatically.

Temp? Both ambient air & engine temp factor into the calculations real time as well as drive cold start/warmup/fast idle control

MAP/vacuum & rpm are the main factors, with both also being used as thresholds for timing changes and certain open loop operation when desired. We even change the target air/fuel ration in certain cases.

Throttle position drives accel enrichments, as well as triggering settings for "wide open", Flood clear, and decel/idle

The system even compensates for engine voltage variations as that impacts injector open/close time, and thus fuel per shot.

And with closed loop idle/fast idle control, you don't even see RPM variance between temp/altitude in that like you do in manual idle systems. 800 rpm warm idle at sea level or high altitude. Even in 2nd gear idling up a steep hill! :-)

We have not implemented knock detection... it's not been an issue with the low compression pinz, and if you use standard unleaded with normal octane (Is it 87?) you won't see any. We use load based retard as needed.

So outside of the specific VE differences between individual engines, we pretty much measure/control the things which impact the engine. And if the VE is off by more than 1-2%, there is something major wrong with the engine that needs to be fixed. (extreme low compression, valve, clogged muffler, etc)

OK, probably way more than you wanted to know. But don't mistake the fact that we do not require people to do their own tuning and assume that it's a simple system. It's not, it's very complex. We just shield the pinz driver from that just like your daily driver does.

Have fun,

Alan
Jim LaGuardia
United States of America
Posts: 1707
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 3:42 pm
Location: San Bernardino Ca
Contact:

Post by Jim LaGuardia »

Alan, Even OEM computers have needed adjustments either by changing a prom or re flashing the memory. ECU's are re flashed daily at dealerships all over the countrty to deal with drivability or emissions changes.
Not knocking your design model just putting factual info on the table.
I understand what you are trying to offer and why you are trying to control your details. Personally I think that attitude is foolish, considering Jake filled most of the apparent U.S. demand. The market for mods on these trucks is very small and I hope you can make a profit on your time.

I will however most likely be installing at least one of Jake's systems in the near future.
Who knows, if your system is affordable I may get a call to install one.

In over 30 years working for the big three and mazda I've seen my share of ECU programming.
This was the only reason I inquired which ECU manufacturer you are using. ECU's, whether "purpose built" or for multiple applications will eventually need adjustment over time. In my opinion giving the operator access to adjustment reduces down time.
The ECU's that I have suggested or used are very fast work on wide or narrow band O2 sensors, and are very user friendly, I just don't see a problem there.
For now, I am enjoying my 16-18 mpg and hope you can get similar results :D
Cheers, Jim LaGuardia
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v510/Goatwerks/
"Arch Magus of Machines."
Erik712m
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 7:52 pm
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Post by Erik712m »

Alan, So with your system how will one trouble shoot, if a part goes bad?
pinztrek
Barbados
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 9:27 pm
Location: Atlanta Area
Contact:

Post by pinztrek »

Jim LaGuardia wrote:Alan, Even OEM computers have needed adjustments either by changing a prom or re flashing the memory. ECU's are re flashed daily at dealerships all over the countrty to deal with drivability or emissions changes.
Increasingly true for the increasingly complex ECU's in use now. Current environments with CAN-BUS, etc talk to all the various car components, etc.

However, even as recent as OBD-II 1997 vehicles, there are millions on the road which drove their entire service live without changes. (I have two myself) Go back to 89-90 level complexity similar to aftermarket systems and most ECU's were not "flashable". (Think escort GT, or early 5.0l mustang) You might see engineering changes from year to year, but not much else.

Having read and extensively studied GM ECU source code from this timeframe it's clear how the OEM's dealt with "aging" issues. And that CPU/code was used in millions of vehicles over several years pretty much without change.
Jim LaGuardia wrote: Not knocking your design model just putting factual info on the table.
Given most aftermarket EFI is just barely beating 25 year old L-Jet functionality, I'm not sure your comparison is valid.

IE: No integration with tranny, ABS, no OBD, etc.
Jim LaGuardia wrote: I understand what you are trying to offer and why you are trying to control your details. Personally I think that attitude is foolish, considering Jake filled most of the apparent U.S. demand. The market for mods on these trucks is very small and I hope you can make a profit on your time.
Thanks for the heads up on the limited market demand. :-) You are right, it's not a huge market. Fortunately we are not limited to the same market as Jake & yourself. In any case, none of the principles involved in our project depend on EFI for our livelihood. It's largely a labor of love and to satisfy some existing customers. Anything else is optional.
Jim LaGuardia wrote: I will however most likely be installing at least one of Jake's systems in the near future.
Who knows, if your system is affordable I may get a call to install one.
That would be great. Though we are jousting some, I recognize the work you have done in the pinz areas like cams, etc
Jim LaGuardia wrote: In over 30 years working for the big three and mazda I've seen my share of ECU programming.
This was the only reason I inquired which ECU manufacturer you are using. ECU's, whether "purpose built" or for multiple applications will eventually need adjustment over time. In my opinion giving the operator access to adjustment reduces down time.
Time will tell. If we need to enable adjustment, I already have the capability to enable access to specific fields and specific ranges as needed via laptop or PC. And an easy to tune base fuel calculation which should more than cover any "aging engine" issues.

One big advantage of utilizing pinz optimized & customized tuning tools. For what it's worth, even Herbert does not have access to most of the parameters, nor does he want to. I've enabled cold start tweaking, and some logging for him & Jason. But that's it.

Once you get the system dialed in right, there is no good reason to tamper with it. We've not changed Herbert's core settings other than coldstart since last February, bout 2700 miles ago. The 2.5l has not changed in the last 1200 miles or so, and even then only minor tweaks based on datalog analysis.

But turn someone loose with the 1000'ish parameters? It just does not make sense unless you are making major component changes like cam's or are trying to reverse engineer the system.

No, no hardware SDS type devices with one line displays.
With tiny laptops like the EEE available in the $200 range, it's just not worth fooling with the HW dongles.
Jim LaGuardia wrote: The ECU's that I have suggested or used are very fast work on wide or narrow band O2 sensors, and are very user friendly, I just don't see a problem there.
That is true for you and I, and probably some others. I like aftermarket EFI, have studied and fiddled with it for a decade. I'm an embedded programmer at heart, it's my vocation, my college training, and on and off my professional career.

But there are some that only want to drive reliably. Not tinker, tune, break and then retune. And we have proven it's possible to have excellent performance without constant twiddling. Why move to EFI if you have to keep fiddling? You've talked enough about changes you've made that we know your 18k miles (admirable) using EFI is not with the same settings.
Jim LaGuardia wrote: For now, I am enjoying my 16-18 mpg and hope you can get similar results :D
These are quite excellent figures. And 3 mpg improvement (over 20%) just from moving to sequential. Assuming you were running at stoich before, and are afterwards, it would be very interesting to understand the physics that allow the engine to see the same power and use 20% less fuel just by changing when/how you squirt.

If duplicatable, and does not sacrifice power/torque you'll have lot's of customers I'm sure. :-)

There are many tradeoffs in tuning, and we have not been hyper focused on mileage. (Though improvements are nice). We are probably more conservative in mixture than most based on Herbert's factory view of when the mix should be stoich vs rich for longevity. False economy to compromise in these areas. The pinz was designed to run richer in certain circumstances, it's a core assumption which the cooling airflow, etc was developed around. What's nice about EFI is you can select when you want that VS when you want economy (safely). And remember, a lean burning engine get's great economy! :-)

A more typical test for us is a sustained wide open throttle pull of a 5000 lb trailer on mountain hills at 55-65. Scary, but the my old swiss 2.5l did it. Herbert has done back to back 3.5hr non-stop 70mph runs delivering a diesel engine. (I'm sure you've done similar)

Likewise, we've not focused on emissions. No doubt the system is cleaner, but we have not attempted to tune to meet emissions. We know we can, just has not been a need for our initial customer base.

On my pinz I really have to watch out for lead foot syndrome. With improved torque/responsiveness, it's very easy to drive faster/more aggressively. And that eat's mileage. Kind of like putting a 4bbl on a v-8 that previously had 2-bbls. In principle a progressive 4bbl would allow better mileage, but only of you kept your foot out of it. hard to do! :-)

Have fun,

Alan
Pinz Enthusiast
Posts: 177
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:31 pm
Location: Brighton, Co

Post by Pinz Enthusiast »

Erik,

Trouble shoot.....lol you will probably get a post with about 1000 words worth of explanation that basically tells you nothing as we have all read here from our new friend Alan, who sounds rather knowledgable but has a need to put down any system other than his, and we all know of HK's reputation, I seem to recall Jason making a comment the he and his father are the only knowledgable pinz mechanics in the USA......

I too have driven Jims truck (during batch fire) and tonight under sequential and what a huge difference, I have also driven a EFI'd truck built by SoCal Pinz and there is a huge difference, Jim's system is the best I have seen so far, (have not been in a truck running Jakes yet), I can say from the number of trucks I have seen at Jim's and knowing a lot of guys who have had work done by him, I deffinately trust him, he will be doing a 2.7 upgrade with perf cam and EFI and we are planning a small supercharger to be installed as well, (wait for alan to comment on the supercharger), I just like you dont trust anybody with a arrogant attitude for schooling us as alan has been, Makes me feel like it's 1977 and Carter is firside chatting us again, thats something we don't need and to quote other posts here and on other boards, posted comments are worthless with out pics, Jim has made all of his R&D pics and info available from the get go, I also am not trusting of OEM, seems like code for I got a kit at Radio Shack and installed it on my truck.
Eric
Anaheim Hills, Ca
1973 712M
1996 LR Disco I
2003 LR Discovery SE
2003 Holiday Rambler Endeavor MH
hope to get a 1969 Ford M656
Jim LaGuardia
United States of America
Posts: 1707
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 3:42 pm
Location: San Bernardino Ca
Contact:

Post by Jim LaGuardia »

Eric, most aftermarket ecu's let you use functions to enable relays to trip warning lamps for various uses. But it really doesn't matter. It is fairly easy to become intuitive to diagnose EFI malfunctions.
All you need is a meter and some patience. Use a method, determin if it is a fuel or spark issue, then test the effected components.
Cheers, Jim LaGuardia
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v510/Goatwerks/
"Arch Magus of Machines."
pinztrek
Barbados
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 9:27 pm
Location: Atlanta Area
Contact:

Post by pinztrek »

Pinz Enthusiast wrote:Erik,
Trouble shoot.....lol you will probably get a post with about 1000 words worth of explanation that basically tells you nothing as we have all read here from our new friend Alan, who sounds rather knowledgable but has a need to put down any system other than his
Not a problem, Eric. I thought we were discussing pinz EFI tech topics. Please point out where I've slammed someone else's system. I have had to defend our system from some initial attacks, and there have been statements made as fact that are absolutely unfounded in the automotive world. We have made some design choices which were questioned, and I tried to (sincerely) explain.

Other have asked some questions in the forum, PM, and email, which I've tried to answer sincerely. Several have commented they have found the dialog instructive.

If the forum does not want any more EFI tech talk, then we can shut down the dialog right now. You'll get Jim's gospel alone most likely, as not many others are working in this area. I don't think Jake has much interest in tech dialog here anymore, but you never know. So not a problem for us. Certainly would save me some time. Maybe someone should do a poll on whether the forum should allow non-goatwerks ideas to be discussed?
Pinz Enthusiast wrote:Erik,
and we are planning a small supercharger to be installed as well, (wait for alan to comment on the supercharger),
Can't speak for Herbert, but I can safely say I have no plans, desires or interest in super or turbo chargers for the pinz. :-) But I will say that forced induction on the pinz should prove interesting.
Pinz Enthusiast wrote:Erik,
posted comments are worthless with out pics, Jim has made all of his R&D pics and info available from the get go, I also am not trusting of OEM, seems like code for I got a kit at Radio Shack and installed it on my truck.
Yep, we got our setup at Radio Shack. Back near the gold plated audio connectors and behind the over priced batteries. Our secret is out!

Just to be clear, I never said our system or controller was OEM. What I did say was that we held ourselves to OEM standards (something that Steyr would have built or approved of). And to achieve that on a vehicle like the pinz required something other than a "one size fits all" generic controller and home made wiring harnesses. I don't understand why it would be a bad thing to want have a system be of the same quality as the pinz itself.

Nuff said, come drive either the 2.7l or 2.5l. Pictures have been on the web for multiple systems for over a year, does not really tell you much.

Good luck with the supercharger!

Alan
pinztrek
Barbados
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 9:27 pm
Location: Atlanta Area
Contact:

Post by pinztrek »

Erik712m wrote:Alan, So with your system how will one trouble shoot, if a part goes bad?
CPU has a error indication if compromised

If either of the temp sensors fail, the system goes into limp-home mode.

Same for loss of communication between the CPU & ignition, it will go to 10 degree advance. This also allows you to test the ignition separately. Coils checked with ohm-meter, as is trigger coil. It works or it does not. Pretty simple.

System is completely drivable with throttle position sensor unplugged or missing

MAP sensor failure the vehicle runs, but badly. Very clear what the problem is. Could limp home, or at least to safety.

As Jim pointed out, with few exceptions, you can isolate with voltmeter if needed.

You can hear the pump run, and fuel pressure is easy to check. (No different from any system)

There are diagnostic lights on the controller (just essential ones which would be difficult to test externally)

Lastly, You can look at the gauges on your PC/laptop if needed. Every sensor has a gauge.

Have fun,

Alan
ka
Posts: 445
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: slc,scruz,chico,bldr,kalalau,flag,sb

Post by ka »

having alan put such a huge amount of time into this the last couple days has been awesome. i appreciate that tramendously. i wish all parties could be part of the same party but i guess that's a pipe dream that never stays lit. i just want some good knowledgable person to make a good efi system i can obtain. and i wish yall luck staying friends in the meantime.
1973 710m
"it is not in the best interest of the shepherd to breed smarter sheep." ~ author unknown

press any key to continue or any other key to quit. ~author confidential
jfhhch
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 9:58 am
Location: Canada

Post by jfhhch »

Alan please check your pm.. Thanks. I have also found this discussion very informative. looking forward to being able to contribute. Jeff
Jim LaGuardia
United States of America
Posts: 1707
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 3:42 pm
Location: San Bernardino Ca
Contact:

Post by Jim LaGuardia »

Eric712M, I did an engine swap in a 404 6cyl Unimog that was fitted with a complete GM throttle body system. All the parts came off of a 87 S-10 6cyl after I straightened out the wireing and installed a check engine lite, the engine was dyno'd (10 hp gain at rear wheels)and the prom reflashed for the application. That is an OBD 1 system (complete closed loop control), and yes you can read the trouble codes with a generic scanner or ground a terminal and flash the codes and get every replacement part anywhere in the U.S.,Canada, or Mexico.
Pretty slick for whoever originally installed it.
I have not yet researched a 4 cylinder equivelent, but am going to look at some Subaru controllers as they would offer similar results.
I have seen some aftermarket injected throttle bodies online, but no reasonable matches. I'll have to go looking at the Porsche 356 mod sites again.
Cheers, Jim LaGuardia
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v510/Goatwerks/
"Arch Magus of Machines."
ka
Posts: 445
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: slc,scruz,chico,bldr,kalalau,flag,sb

Post by ka »

godspeed to jim! that gives me gr8 hope! simplicity rules.

so from all this efi talk, i take it the best tack is to wait for maybe a 1/2 year to see what becomes a reality?
1973 710m
"it is not in the best interest of the shepherd to breed smarter sheep." ~ author unknown

press any key to continue or any other key to quit. ~author confidential
Erik712m
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 7:52 pm
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Post by Erik712m »

Eric, 1977 was the year I was born, can't say I remember Carter. :lol:

Russ, or any one in Alan's area seen his or driven EFI pinz?
Jim LaGuardia
United States of America
Posts: 1707
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 3:42 pm
Location: San Bernardino Ca
Contact:

Post by Jim LaGuardia »

Ka, It's up to you how long you want to wait, regardless of the outcome, the average complete kit will still have to sell around $3500-$5000 (using all new components).
Installation is extra. So as you can see, it can cost a bit to do and there is very little profit if any.
That was why I did the hardware kit, it lets you buy pieces a little at a time without killing your project budget. Using existing off the shelf parts makes it that much easier to get good used components at a wrecking yard to save big$$ , then you install it yourself and save those $
I got all 4 of my LS1 coils with the mounting and sub harness for $65 on Ebay, much less than the $220 I paid for the Saturn module and coil packs that I ran earlier.
The computer choice is just one factor in cost that can vary from a simple Mega Squirt($250) to the more advanced units like the EMS ecu's that I have used(1500+) or a Motec system($2500-$5000).
One of the big differences between my system is the size of the throttle body, mine is a 60mm ; others that I know of are using a 35mm Ford throttle body from an early 90's Explorer V6.
They give different accelleration atributes due to airflow volume.
Cheers, Jim LaGuardia
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v510/Goatwerks/
"Arch Magus of Machines."
ka
Posts: 445
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: slc,scruz,chico,bldr,kalalau,flag,sb

Post by ka »

jim - i haven't seen your kit. i dont know how to put a system together. do you offer that service? would you do the whole thing?

i'm pretty uneducated in the field of vehicle mechanics.
1973 710m
"it is not in the best interest of the shepherd to breed smarter sheep." ~ author unknown

press any key to continue or any other key to quit. ~author confidential
Locked